Grammaticality.

grammaticality (countable and uncountable, plural grammaticalities) (linguistics) (of language) The state or attribute of obeying the rules of grammar; grammatical correctness.

Grammaticality. Things To Know About Grammaticality.

grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 31, 2017 at 20:52. Jan. 38.5k 5 5 gold badges 76 76 silver badges 163 163 bronze badges. asked Jan 31, 2017 at 15:42. Jake Black Jake Black. 63 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 3 3 bronze badges. 1. Welcome to German.Stackexchange! I took the liberty to clarify the question, because ...grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 20, 2021 at 0:10. JEL. 32.7k 4 4 gold badges 66 66 silver badges 108 108 bronze badges. asked Sep 3, 2010 at 8:11. korchev korchev. 451 1 1 gold badge 4 4 silver badges 6 6 bronze badges. 1. 1.The meaning of GRAMMATICAL is of or relating to grammar. How to use grammatical in a sentence.His or her own, ‘on the ground’ direct experience. ‘As of now’ is often used to report direct, step by step progress: Workman: ‘As of now, we can see the cable, and we’ll be connecting it to the router shortly’. Reporter: ‘As of now, the suspects have been isolated in the building, by the police’.

The standard way of saying this is. You heard it correctly. There is a trend in many dialects of American English to allow the use of adjectives for adverbs in certain circumstances.A Grammaticality Judgment Task (GJT) was administered after a 10-day interval from the OPT for assessing the learners’ ability to recognize grammatical problems. The participants were given a set of 47 grammatical and ungrammatical sentences including distractors. All of the sentences contained extended projections (IPs, DPs, CPs, and NegPs ...

Grammaticality Literature British English Literary English. 06/29/19. Is it possible to use present and past in one sentence? > In *On The Road* Jack admits to Justin ...

In that case, "solution" is the noun form of "solve". There's no need to take a noun derived from a verb and then derive yet another verb from that noun. You say "We are working on solving the problem", NOT "We are working on solutioning the problem." If by "solution" you mean a solid mixed into a liquid, then the verb is "dissolve".For more than a decade, I have always seen/used the phrase "Take/Consider ... as an example" followed by a comma. Then, my recent visit on this page got me confused and raised more questions in me.. Are the two phrases interchangeable, or do they differ in meaning/usage?2 Answers. When "u" makes the same sound as the "y" in you, or "o" makes the same sound as "w" in won, then "a" is used: An user did sound incorrect; It is nice to be right. This is missing at least one other exceptional case, when 'E' makes the same sound as the 'y' in you, like a European.Individuals with poor communication skills have difficulties expressing ideas in a way they can be understood by others. In writing, examples include using language that requires clarification or making serious grammatical errors.

1 Answer. "Acceptability" is about speaker judgments of utterances, whether they "accept" a stimulus. "Grammaticality" is not about speakers, it is about the abstract grammar that describes a language – does the grammar generate the output. However, there is a tendency (more than minor) for linguists to slip from acceptability to grammaticality.

As to grammaticality, sure, people will look at you weird if you use it in speech. But if you're writing a novel then, sure, it's fine. It's not a special rule of English. All languages allow this kind of parallelism. From Latin: Fur furem, lupus lupum cognoscit. "It takes a thief to know a thief, a wolf another wolf."

grammaticality; negation; neither-nor; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38. Community Bot. 1. asked Jul 14, 2011 at 21:00. language hacker language hacker. 5,728 56 56 gold badges 95 95 silver badges 122 122 bronze badges. 0. Add a comment |Hey, George . . . Beginning a sentence with Hey, is pretty conclusively diagnostic of an amicable colloquial register largely unconstrained by the niceties of formal expository prose.. In that context the sentence is unimpeachably "grammatical", at least in American speech. Couple without of is acceptable AmE.. Hey, George, we're headin over to the VFW for a couple beers.to fill in. to see through. to figure out. to show off. to go away. to write up. These verbs all have distinct senses compared to the plain verbs. To fall and to fall down have very similar meanings, but they are distinct. As outis nihil noted, 'to fall down the stairs' is very different to 'to fall on the stairs'.or. over one year of experience. or similar to yours but meaningful-. 1+ years of experience. It is also good enough to write exact term in years and months since you mentioned resumés, like. An experience of one year and four months. If it's over 1 year but less than 13 months, it's better to say. one year. Share.grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow asked Jun 9, 2016 at 16:31. Steve Steve. 33 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 3 3 bronze badges. 2. Could you give a little more context to the question? Is the testing occurring inside the program itself or are you testing the program as a user.Dort kann man nicht nur gut essen, sondern auch sich auch ausruhen.. This is about the different actions possible at that place, so auch must be near the second infinitive.. Dort kann man nicht nur gut essen, sondern auch er kann sich auch ausruhen.. Same with the complete verb phrase kann sich ausruhen, BUT:. Dort kann nicht nur sie sich ausruhen, sondern auch er (kann sich ausruhen).

measures (an oral production task, three grammaticality judgement tests and a metalinguistic knowledge test) and investigated the relationship of these measures with two general measures of L2 proficiency (the TOEFL and the Secondary Level English Proficiency Test - SLEP). Han and Ellis found that the SLEP test was significantly"Indeed" can start a sentence as either a conjunction or an interjection. As a conjunction, indeed provides emphasis or indicates that the sentence is an example of, or evidence for, a claim made in the previous sentence. As an interjection, indeed indicates surprise or sarcastic doubt. In this use, indeed is often the only word in the sentence.He thinks she'll marry him?grammaticality; nouns; grammatical-number; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jul 29, 2012 at 22:15. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked May 28, 2011 at 22:52. zendar zendar. 143 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. 2.Require with an agent subject can take an infinitive complement with B-Raising. That means no for, since that's the mark of an unRaised subject: A has required B to effect a change is grammatical. It can also take an untensed that-complement (what used to be called "the subjunctive"), but in this case the that complementizer cannot be deleted: A has required that B effect a change is OK, but ...Grammaticality - 'Is Used' Versus 'Has Been Used' Versus 'Was Used' As you just learned, all of these phrases are correct to say, but in different circumstances. You know that they're all in different tenses, which means they'd be used somewhat differently in a sentence, similar to the phrases ' has been/have been/had been ...Please email that picture to me. As you can see, there are some differences between how the word "mail" is used vs. how the word "email" is used, but that difference isn't that "mail" takes "to" while "email" doesn't. It's more that "email" is used as the electronic equivalent of not just "mail", but also "letter". Share.

Sorted by: 65. The word uniform begins with a palatal approximant /j/. The palatal approximant is a consonantal sound, even though the letter itself is a vowel. Since we use the pronunciation of the word following the article to determine whether we use "a" or "an", and because it is pronounced starting with a consonant, we use "a".

grammaticality; grammaticality-in-context; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Dec 16, 2017 at 5:01. Stephie. 14.3k 2 2 gold badges 40 40 silver badges 58 58 bronze badges. asked Dec 16, 2017 at 2:33. Macer Macer. 155 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. 0. Add a comment |I messaged you this morning. I will message you in the morning. Note that you'd only use this morning if it were the same day that you messaged the person. in the morning can be used in more situations. Being past tense, if you had some other way to indicate the date, in the morning would be okay.I am wondering about the wording of this sentence: Empowering solid decisions by providing transparency of the system landscape and IT processes. I'd like to ask if "on" can be used in this context as opposed to "of" and which variant sounds better/is more correct.I would agree with your judgement that *"They weren't that good reviews " and *"They weren't that good people" are both ungrammatical. This judgment seems to be consistent with Frank Van Eynde's description of "The Big Mess Construction":This construction, for which Berman (1974) coined the term Big Mess Construction, only ocurs in nominals with an indefinite article.Both are semantically correct as they are. But compare. I'll send it to you. and. I'll send it you. The second sentence wouldn't make sense in formal writing, but is found to be understandable in northern England spoken usage.This study investigates the relationship between syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) descriptors assigned to the same document are chosen to represent the syntagmatic relations and their paradigmatic relations are determined using the structure of the MeSH thesaurus.grammaticality; grammatical-number; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 4, 2011 at 18:33. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Apr 4, 2011 at 14:24. Alan Spark Alan Spark. 273 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 7 7 bronze badges. 10. 1.Since there is no single official arbiter of American English, there is often disagreement among the various experts, particularly in areas that many regard as involving the finer or “more obscure” points of …

You would write "in die Schule" (accusative) if you are talking about going to school. Ich gehe in die Schule. "Zur Schule" is equivalent to "in die Schule". It is commonly used and grammatically right and equivalent to say either "Ich gehe in die Schule" or "Ich gehe zur Schule".

This is a particular usage of "ride" which implies that one is also "driving" the bicycle. You would say "ride on a bicycle" only if the person was riding the bicycle and someone else was driving, which might happen if someone was sitting behind the driver, or sitting on the handlebars, for example. Also, if you change the phrasing, "ride on ...

The word 'then' has many meanings. In some of its meanings, it is perfectly grammatical at the end of a sentence. For instance, from definition 3.b from the Merriam-Webster online dictionary ( here) 3.b: according to that : as may be inferred. 'your mind is made up, then?'.1. Neither of those example sentence look entirely natural. I would rephrase it in one of two ways: She quickly said, "Hello," instead. Instead, she quickly said, "Hello." Which version would depend the context. (The style of the surrounding text, and so on.) Share. Improve this answer.Code for the paper Sentence Ambiguity, Grammaticality and Complexity Probes - GitHub - ufal/ambiguity-grammaticality-complexity: Code for the paper Sentence ...And when we observe our grammaticality judgment, it turns out that this replacement is also grammatical. That's some evidence that words after class behave together as a constituent in this sentence. We can do the same thing with the string the students. Replace that string with the pronoun they: The students saw their friends after class.In British English, there are some uses where am/is/are having is idiomatic, for example: for some mental states or personal experiences: I'm having second thoughts about going out tonight. He's having a panic attack. They're having fun. where have has the meaning being the host for (either an event or a visitor), and with a sense of future ...grammaticality; passive-voice; progressive-aspect; continuous-aspect; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 5, 2017 at 4:06. herisson. 79.6k 9 9 gold badges 202 202 silver badges 353 353 bronze badges. asked Feb 14, 2013 at 11:35. Jamal Jamal.Jan 9, 2019 · The exact rules for grammaticality aren't well understood, but broadly, the further the pronoun gets from the subject (e.g. the longer the subordinate clause is), the more acceptable it sounds (at what length is dialect dependent). The following may or may not sound acceptable: Results from elicited production and grammaticality judgment tasks implemented preceding and following the instruction showed that the constructional instruction group had improvements to a greater extent than the form-focused instruction group. These findings underscore the validity of the construction-grammar approach as an effective teaching ...Erythroderma, often described as generalized exfoliative dermatitis, is a condition in which erythema involves greater than 90% of the body surface, often as a result of an underlying inflammatory skin condition, which can result in a variety of systemic manifestations and potentially lead to life-threatening complications.

grammaticality-in-context; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 10, 2020 at 19:32. Gi Han. asked Apr 10, 2020 at 14:39. Gi Han Gi Han. 1 3 3 bronze badges. 3. The "linking verb" here is IS, which forms / identifies the relationship between the solar panel and how it's rated / considered by pundits.1 Answer. Both versions are perfectly fine. I will send you an email. "you" is an indirect object. It is understood that the subject is not sending "you", but rather sending the email. I will send an email to you. sounds a little stilted. In conversational English, you would probably use email as a verb. I will email you.Nov 6, 2012 at 14:16. While both are correct, due to ambiguity of the expression "used to" (both "accustomed" and "was doing it in the past but isn't any more" on top of the fundamental "utilized for" usage) it is better to use "used for" or you may unwittingly build a garden path sentence. – SF. Nov 6, 2012 at 14:24.Instagram:https://instagram. employee tuition assistancemaui invitational tournamentany day movie wikipedia1tamilmv.proxy 1. You absolutely can use it twice in this context! There is no rule against it. However, you should always look out for ways to make your writing more concise! This can often delete those pesky, repeated words from your sentences. For example, a shorter way to write your sentence (and eliminate 1 "was") is: The number one thing every special ...The problem is not that you used due to at the beginning of a sentence. The problem is that due to must be followed by a nominal phrase, since to is a preposition and prepositions are (almost) always followed by nominal phrases. For this reason, you need to use a verbal noun or a gerund after to:. Due to having fewer features than an actual … choctaw flour corntaxable nonprofit Require with an agent subject can take an infinitive complement with B-Raising. That means no for, since that's the mark of an unRaised subject: A has required B to effect a change is grammatical. It can also take an untensed that-complement (what used to be called "the subjunctive"), but in this case the that complementizer cannot be deleted: A has required that B effect a change is OK, but ...2. As long as you use the subject pronoun "I," and not the object pronoun "me," it's grammatical. You can put the first person pronoun either at the beginning of the sentence or after others, such as "others and I…." I and a couple of others here (ha ha) agree with putting "I" before the others. I disagree with the poster who said it's a ... how to prepare an annual budget for a company The PLS-5 is designed for use with children aged birth through 7;11 to assess language development and identify children who have a language delay or disorder. The test aims to identify receptive and expressive language skills in the areas of attention, gesture, play, vocal development, social communication, vocabulary, concepts, language ...I learned that the possessive apostrophe -s is used for living beings and the "of" form for non living things: The dog's name is Sherlock The color of the flower is yellow However, I have ... grammaticality. Andrei Herford. 97. asked Sep 18 at 8:15.Per means according to, so you can in fact say "per our agreement, you must...".The as in your first sentence is pleonastic, and sounds affected: I'd avoid it. The very common "as per usual" is a humorous prolixity. Whether to use per or according to is the same as whether to use any archaic form or common usage. In some areas (e.g. law) it's more common to …